On Wednesday, he took to X to deny the allegations, telling his followers decisively, ‘I’m not Satoshi’ before adding in a follow-up tweet: ‘I also don’t know who Satoshi is, and I think it is good for Bitcoin that this is the case, as it helps Bitcoin be viewed a new asset class, the mathematically scarce digital commodity.’

Nevertheless, the New York Times’ conclusion was drawn from over a year of trawling through thousands of decades-old internet postings, revealing a trail of opaque clues that weaved together point towards Back.

submitted by /u/ecky–ptang-zooboing [link] [comments]

r/CryptoCurrencyRead More

You might also be interested in reading Is AI the key to stopping nuisance calls? O2’s ‘suspected scam’ alerts flag 50MILLION per month.